1 Comment

Would Providing FSA with Weapons Increase Killing in Syria?

When US and Europe leaders claim they oppose providing the Free Syrian Army in Syria with effective weapons not to increase the killing in Syria, they are simply not telling the entire truth.

On the short term, killing will increase and those newly killed would be simply ‎Assad army and thugs which means, on the mid and longer term, less death as ‎Assad will not have enough thugs, army elements, and military equipment to commit slaughters and kill armless innocents. These Assad elements and thugs would either be dead, which is less bad than allowing them to kill innocents, or flee and desert Assad thugs and army which is better for all parties.

If the US and Europe leaders insist on not to provide the FSA with effective weapons, it would be better to act on their own and impose a No Fly Zone on Syria instead of just bombarding Bashar Al-Assad with the strongest adjectives and adverbs English language has in the unabridged dictionaries after the Obama’s administration have depleted them.

They need either to defend the Syrian people and impose a No Fly Zone on Syria or parts of Syria or let FSA  have effective weapons to defend themselves and the Syrian people against Assad warplanes and armored vehicles. Period.

One comment on “Would Providing FSA with Weapons Increase Killing in Syria?

  1. Everything is very open with a very clear description of the issues. It was truly informative. Your website is very useful. Many thanks for sharing!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: